In this essay I first problematize the idea that one can define art and ask the curious question whether there can be the experience and creativity of art without the very concept as such. I conjecture that perhaps one can for language as in verbal language is distinct from the language (visuality) of art. This leads to the ubiquity of art and the experience thence of life itself as potentially a creative one that itself may be art, if only one has a certain kind of art lens if you will, through one may perceive and make of the world/universe. I then discuss the future of art given the post structural, post-modern language turn and the undoing of modernism, even the metaphysical-abstract and the correspondence thinking of mimetic resemblance in art, as well as the notion that art is sacred towards it secular transformation, into an unknown and unpredictable future trajectory.