GAJRC | Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business

Journal Name:	Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business
Abbr. Title:	Glob Acad J Econ Buss
ISSN(Print):	2706-9001
ISSN(Online):	2707-2584
Frequency:	Bi-Monthly
Language:	English
Chief Editor:	Prof. P Malyadri
Publisher:	Scholars Middle East Publishers
Country of Origin:	United Arab Emirates

Journal Name:

Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business

Abbr. Title:

Glob Acad J Econ Buss

ISSN(Print):

2706-9001

ISSN(Online):

2707-2584

Frequency:

Bi-Monthly

Language:

English

Chief Editor:

Prof. P Malyadri

Publisher:

Scholars Middle East Publishers

Country of Origin:

United Arab Emirates

This study provides a qualitative literature review on the relationship between green finance and firm performance in Ho Chi Minh City (HCM) through the aggregation of academic knowledge, key themes, and research gaps to develop a conceptual framework for informing future empirical studies. The reviews covers peer-reviewed journals, reports, and policy papers published from 2020 to 2025 focusing on green finance practices such as green credit, green bonds and ESG investing, and their impacts on financial, environmental, and operational performance. The findings are organized across core dimensions of green finance and performance, with a critical evaluation of methodologies and academically contributions. The proposed conceptual framework details the direct and indirect impacts of green finance on firm performance, financial outcomes, environmental impacts, and stakeholder perceptions. Five hypotheses that relate to the performance of CSR, the commitment of management, environmental performance, intangible capital and green innovation are able to improve financial performance. This framework aims to deepen understanding of green finance in Vietnamese businesses and promote its integration into operations. The study advocates a balanced approach to profitability, sustainability, and stakeholder trust, contributing to the discourse on sustainable development in emerging economies.

Abstract: The rapid development of social media, especially TikTok, has driven the popularity of affiliate marketing through influencers. Generation Z—young, proactive, and tech-savvy consumers—has become a segment strongly influenced by these marketing strategies. This study proposes a research model to examine the influence of TikTok influencers on the purchasing behavior of Gen Z in Ho Chi Minh City via affiliate marketing as an intermediary mechanism. Based on the theoretical foundations of planned behavior and emotion, the proposed model connects factors such as influencer popularity, congruence (fit), and credibility with purchasing behavior. Simultaneously, the model incorporates mediating factors like Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) and emotional responses to elucidate the mechanism by which influencer impact is converted into consumer purchase decisions.

E-waste has globally become an increasingly urgent issue, particularly in developing countries. Although a lot of studies have been conducted, the key themes and development trends in e-waste research have not yet been fully systematized. Understanding the current state of this field not only helps identify pressing issues but also contributes to shaping new research directions. Following that, the study aims to propose a model of the factors influencing consumers’ intention to participate in collection and their recycling behavior toward e-waste. The proposed model incorporates several key factors, including Value, Attitude, Supporting reasons (Environmental Benefits, Personal Benefits), and Opposing reasons (Risk Barriers, Usage Barriers, Value Barriers, and Image Barriers). Additionally, the Intention to Collect is examined to establish a systematic theoretical foundation, thereby contributing to the expansion of the research framework on consumer participation in e-waste collection and recycling.

Feb. 10, 2025

Modern Versus Traditional Irrigation Systems: Implications for Technical Efficiency and Input-Output Relationship in Northern Tanzania’s Horticulture Sector

Gerald Absanto, Josephine Mkunda, Anthony Nyangarika
Glob Acad J Econ Buss; 2025, 7(1): 1-13
DOI : https://doi.org/10.36348/gajeb.2025.v07i01.001

This study evaluates the technical efficiency (TE) of modern and traditional irrigation methods and their subsequent impact on farm productivity, profitability, and sustainability. The research uses a sample of 540 smallholder farmers from water stress region of northern Tanzania. The study reveals significant differences between adopters of modern irrigation techniques (MITs) and non-adopters using furrow irrigation: tomato yield was 732.94 kg vs. 387.35 kg, onion yield was 2952.57 kg vs. 395.53 kg, and pepper yield was 552.34 kg vs. 505.02 kg; input usage also varied, with adopters using 1.58 vs. 1.38 acres (tomatoes), 1.30 vs. 1.50 acres (onions), and 1.56 vs. 1.18 acres (peppers), as well as differences in seed, fertilizer, and agrochemical quantities. Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), this study estimated the technical efficiency scores for farmers, the findings reveal that land cultivated (β1=0.537, p=0.000) and fertilizer use (β3=0.353, p=0.000) were significant drivers of productivity, indicating that increasing these inputs substantially boosts agricultural output. In contrast, herbicide use negatively impacts productivity (β6=−0.268, p=0.005), suggesting a need for more efficient or reduced usage of herbicides. The inefficiency effects model highlights that farming experience (δ2=10.53, p=0.012) positively influences technical efficiency, underscoring the value of practical expertise in optimizing resource use. The technical efficiency of the farmers varies widely, with a mean of 88.43%, a minimum of 45.28%, and a maximum of nearly 100%, suggesting room for improvement in less efficient operations. The analysis of technical efficiency across irrigation methods shows a significant advantage for modern irrigation techniques over furrow irrigation. For onions, sprinkler irrigation achieved a mean technical efficiency of 0.928 (p=0.000) compared to 0.589 under furrow irrigation. Similarly, for tomatoes, drip irrigation resulted in a mean efficiency of 0.850, substantially higher than 0.430 for furrow irrigation (p=0.000). For peppers, drip irrigation also outperformed furrow irrigation with mean efficiencies of 0.813 and 0.338, respectively (p=0.000). The study also revealed that while traditional irrigation methods had lower efficiency scores, proper management of resources such as fertilizers and pest control was crucial in mitigating inefficiency. The results highlight the importance of efficient farm management practices, including the use of appropriate technologies and optimized resource allocation, in achieving higher technical efficiency. The study recommends targeted subsidies, capacity-building programs, improved infrastructure, and public-private partnerships to promote the adoption of modern irrigation technologies among smallholder farmers.